Letter from Reader: Question on Disciplining Kids, Comments

I found that you started writing your blog again :) I like to read your thoughts, though you tend to go more extreme in one way or another from me.  :P About spanking, before my daughter was born I was totally pro-Ezzo.  That lasted about an hour into her little life.   ;)    She’s 15 months now, still breastfeeds when she needs it, sleeps with me, naps when she’s tired, etc.  But where I tend to disagree with AP is that I don’t think that the child does know what they need (I’m not saying you’re AP).

I really didn’t like the idea of spanking her, and until she was about 10 months old I saw no reason to.  Then she got into the habit of pitching an all out fit every time I got her dressed.  I have no problem with her pitching a fit once in a while because she’s tired, over stimulated, really wanted the remote, etc… but when it became an every day thing I saw it was just becoming a habit.  Tried re-directing, laughing, making it a game, just because I’d rather do that than swat, but no such luck. 

So I flicked her fat little thigh and told her to knock it off.  And got her dressed and life moved on.  It took a couple more times of just one flick over the next week or so, and now if she starts pitching a fit I just tell her to ‘knock it off’ and that does it. I doubt I’ll spank a child after they’re 3 or so, but with the little ones I don’t really see a problem with it, I guess.  She’s gotten flicked maybe 10 times in her life, the getting dressed ones, and she was in the habit of pinching me while nursing and after re-directing a gazillion times, I did something a little more.

I guess what I have a problem with is punishment and I don’t see this as punishment. I see it more as a negative stimuli ~shrug~ I’d personally rather swat/flick whatever her once or twice and move on than have a struggle getting dressed every day, or wean her because she’s insistent on pinching. 

The problem I have with people who don’t spank is that usually they come across as, “If you spank you are the devil!” and that it’s “absolutely evil.”  I’m not saying you come across that way, it’s just that’s what usually turns me off from the no spanking arguments.

I’m rather opinionated in what is okay and what isn’t with her.  If she’s screaming in her carseat because she doesn’t want to be there but I  have to get to the bank before they close, eh, go ahead and scream.  If she’s screaming because I’m wasting time on the internet, eh, I better go be a parent ;)   If she is tired and needs a nap but isn’t going down, she can go ahead and cry if rocking/nursing isn’t working.  If *I* want her to nap so I can do laundry without having to re-fold the clothes 97 times, that’s not a good reason to put her down if she’s not tired. 

I’m really surprised how this has been.  I heard moms talking on MDC and whatnot about ‘mother’s instinct’ and I thought that was a load of BS, because their ‘mother’s instinct’ seemed to involve their children running wild, emptying their cupboards and dumping things, keeping the whole house up all night, etc, because, you know, they’re only children, they don’t know any better.

I also understand that children can be so so so different from each other.  What works for Hannah could trigger rage in another child, or make them fearful of mommy’s hand. And in that case, you, uh, change what you’re doing. 

I usually tend to not talk about spanking at all because it is really hard to explain what I think to people who are super opinionated in one way or another.  But I have a feeling that you’d understand and not say ‘her children are destined to be heathens’ or ‘you evil person, you hit a BABY?!’ :o )

My friend wrote the above letter, and this just goes to show how difficult it is to communicate with typed medium.  When I talk about concerns I have with spanking, it is emphatically not with any concern towards what she is doing.  I’m pretty much on the same page she’s on.  And, I wouldn’t call that “spanking” as a discipline philosopy.  That sounds exactly like what I do with my 2 and a half year old kid: different issues, same basic core.  Sometimes it seems like a little swat saves us all a lot of grief.   

To me, what my friend describes is not punitive parenting (punitive, to me, is something like: I will punish you if you step out of line.  Sin must be punished and it’s my job to punish your sins.  Punishment is how you will learn to be good…)”  That’s punitive in my mind, and that’s the philosophy taught in way too many Christian parenting books and, to be blunt, it’s in complete opposition to what Jesus did on the Cross.   

We all probably have our own definitions in our mind.  My friend initially thought what I was advocating went against what she desribes in her note above.  I had another friend mention the same thing.  Whereas I basically do exactly what she does, so obviously didn’t mean to sound as if I was “anti” it.  I think this shows, if only slightly, how the conversation of discipline is terribly sticky.  But I some people can’t seem to get away from sticky.  And I think these things are good to talk about, good to wonder about.  

I mean, it’s our kids, after all, and it’s how they learn about God—-more than any devotional times or read-alouds, more than singing hymns (or U2’s “Yahweh,” or VeggieTale ditties on long car rides), more than memorizing verses or driving them to AWANA or teaching their Sunday School, they learn about God and how God thinks about them through the way we are with them.  And if I mainly discipline them through shaming techniques (whether that involves spanking or time-outs, who really cares, if the undercurrent is still shame), then I’m teaching them that they should be shamed before God, that God’s love includes shame, that shame is their proper place in life, a rightful voice in their head. 

I want to be the kind of parent that is (still a royal screw up, since the Spirit inside of me is housed in dirt, you know, but is) the kind of royal screw up that says she’s sorry, that is seeking to love wholly, that is on the same team as her kids, working to keep them within certain boundaries for their own safety (whether physical safety or mental and spiritual safety) but giving them ample freedom whenever possible in every other way, room to grow, to breath, to thrive—the kind of parent that embraces her kids with the same grace-filled arms God embraces her with.      

12 Responses to this post.

  1. Posted by Cally Tyrol on January 1, 2008 at 11:20 pm

    I guess one of the places where I take issue in this whole debate is that people (namely the Pearls) take the whole idea of pain as a negative stimuli (basic operant conditioning) and call it God’s Way of raising children.

    If you (in the general sense, not you, Molly) wants to flick a leg or slap a hand, I’m not going to stand around and tell you not to. Just don’t call it “biblical discipline”. And you don’t, Molly, of course!! And I do agree with you that its really the mentality behind the practical aspects of the philosophy that gets to me. You described it above.

    Parenting is so muddy, isn’t it? I mean, we all have our own opinions about what constitutes discipline vs punishment. We are all doing our best. We all want to raise godly children who love the Lord and desire to serve and glorify him. Do we really need to be spending our time criticizing the way another family does things?

    One of my best friends spanks. She threatens spanking all the time and sometimes she does it. She flicks hands and legs and it breaks my heart every time she does it. I have to fight the urge to say something and I’ve done pretty well so far because it is none of my business.

    And yes, I’m a pretty rabid anti-spanker… for MY family. Do I wish other people didn’t do it? Yeah, but I’m not on a crusade to change the way other families do things. Hopefully, we can “lead by example” and show others that spanking isn’t the only immediate consequence that produces the desired result.

    The bottom line for me is that my kids aren’t tomatoes and they aren’t mules or dogs. We aren’t Amish and I don’t have a woodshed. I have God’s Word and I have His example in the Lord Jesus Christ. And how GRATEFUL I am for THAT!

  2. Very thoughtful reflection on a challenging topic. I agree what we say and do with our children related to discipline carries as much or more weight than anything they’ll learn in Sunday School.

    Interesting you should identify spanking as a shaming technique. My wife and I chose to not spank for various reasons, but I do see it as an acceptable disciplinary strategy within certain parameters (behavior,timing,setting,age,method, follow-up, etc…).

    I see spanking more as an attempt to demonstrate negative consequences for negative behavior. I speak with many adults who were spanked and very few carry shame over it. In many cases, they speak of it with sort of a glint in their eyes, like, “my parents cared enough to give me what I deserved.”

    Understand, I still think spanking is, as you put it, contrary to a basic Christian ethic (What Would Jesus Do…). I also still see it being more often counter-productive than effective. Still, I think it’s acceptable for a Christian parent to spank if done so with a non-shaming spirit.

  3. Molly, I think you and I are on (roughly) the same page concerning spanking (swatting). I used it as a last negative stimuli for my daughter. My son needed slightly stronger measures, so I usually needed to say things to him like, “I’m going to count to 3 then you get a spank.” Nine times out of ten, he’d back down as I got to one. The 10th time I’d have to spank him … but he is still my ornery, argumentative child. This will be great when he is a lawyer or something, but OMG, tiresome as a mom. It’s also NOT something to be beaten out of him. As his mother, I have to learn how to work with it and understand that it’s going to be a strength in an adult. So how do I mold it in a child? I think that’s the real kicker … some of these discipline issues come out of problems that will be strengths for the children when they are adults … so what do you do with them in the meantime? How do you NOT crush that spirit, but help mold in appropriate ways?

  4. Sonja,
    That’s exactly what I was trying to say, only you did it in one paragraph. :) And as for not crushing the spirit but yet still molding appropriately, I will be able to discuss that more in-depth in about twenty or twenty-five years from now… :lol:
    .
    PistolPete,
    You bring up some very good points, particularly how “spanking” looks—-in some cases, it’s a terribly humiliating and shaming ordeal, and in other homes, it was matter-of-fact, NON shaming, etc. This really makes it hard to talk about, since it’s got such a wide range of meaning.
    .
    I like adding the aspect of shame, because shaming techniques are just…not cool, period. And if spanking (or non-spanking parenting methods) are shaming/condemning/humiliating, it’s not a good way to raise kids, period. Two parents can give “time-outs,” and one uses it in a shaming way and the other uses it in a very constructive way… Maybe it’s not always so much the actual technique itself, but the underlying way in which it is used…? I don’t know.
    .
    Cally,
    I appreciate your voice here and encourage you to keep on piping it up. :) Some folks may have no idea what you are talking about (what with the tomatoes, dogs, and woodsheds) but for those of us who’ve been in these circles, what you are saying is SORELY needed!

    .
    And now, the kids are loaded up…off to the orthodontist we go…

  5. Posted by Catherine on January 2, 2008 at 2:50 pm

    I’m a non-mommy (although I hope very much to some day be a mommy). I have a question about the interaction of shame and discipline. Although my parents sometimes spanked me, more often, they told me to go stand in the corner or go to my room until I could learn to behave myself. I don’t think they wanted to shame me (they are strict, but very loving, and good parents), but after being disciplined, I almost always felt ashamed about my behavior – which I think is a good thing. I felt ashamed because I had hurt my parents or my siblings; I felt ashamed for not being as kind or as considerate as I could have been. I realized that my parents didn’t tell me to go to my room because they hated me, but because they wanted to teach me right from wrong. I guess I think of shame as something akin to remorse – and I think we should feel remorse when we have done something wrong.

  6. I really agree, Catherine, that remorse is a good thing. Thanks for your comment—-I had better clarify what I’m talking about.
    .
    What I mean by shame is this:
    .
    “Go to your room, you bad boy! How could you do something like that? What were you THINKING?”
    .
    That kind of statement says,
    .
    “You are a bad boy—who you ARE is bad, not just what you did, not to mention that you are a stupid idiot (”How could you do something like that,” ie, “Smart people like ME would never be that dumb!”).
    .
    That, to me, is an example of using shame to motivate a person to change their behaviour. The kid is shamed into acting in a different way—condemnation being an integral part, NOT by condemning the wrong ACTION comitted, but condemning the kid himself.
    .
    Also, what is being leveraged here is the parents acceptance of the kid himself. “If you do it the way I want it, I will accept you and call you a good boy—I will see *you* as good. If you don’t perform to my expectations, I will call you a bad boy—I will see *YOU* as bad.”
    .
    This is not the way God looked at us. If God was like that, He’d have never sent His Son. I think it’s fair to say that God has boundaries, and that He doesn’t let His kids cross them without some sort of consequence (not if He loves us, anyway!), but it’s also fair to say that God doesn’t treat us with condemnation, blame, and conditional love (Romans 8:1—there is no condemnation in Christ).

  7. Molly, great thoughts. I struggle sometimes with my kids because my response has so much more to do with how I’M feeling (am I anxious, stressed, overwhelmed, underslept…) than the particular behavior of the kid. And yet sometimes I can see how my response is shaming, albeit usually not in obvious ways. It is hard to communicate clearly that a behavior is unacceptable without communicating the child is unacceptable when the behavior is a pattern for that child. And yet, as Sonja beautifully pointed out, aspects of our kids that create challenge now will blossom into assets in adulthood if we are able to guide without shaming, at least a good bit of the time :)

    On a theological note, a problem I with traditional Christianity is the idea that God had so much wrath toward us that he had to take that wrath out on his son in order to avoid (righteously) toasting us…implying that God’s love would have been conditional, had it not been for God’s mercy triumphing over God’s righteous wrath. Boundaries yes, eternal condemnation?

    I would never want to parent by that model and hope my heavenly father is a far more perfectly and unconditionally loving parent than I…

    I understand the atonement more as God processing God’s own anger/grief over sin in order to be available with open arms for us, even when we keep doing the wrong thing. We have go through many similar grief processes and little deaths and resurrections in order to access that unconditional love for our own kids…

  8. Posted by Can Dance on January 7, 2008 at 9:28 am

    yes but….
    I am also an anti-spanker, though its more than just spanking. and though I appreciate where the author is coming from, its super frustrating to me to hear no spanking=no discipline=running wild children.
    I am can be such a hard ass mom. There are things that I put up with that other moms wouldn’t, but they aren’t moral issues, they are just parenting differences. but when it comes to disrespect, hitting others, yada yada, I pretty much don’t tolerate it. I will let my child know, on no uncertain terms, that they are misbehaving and they need to stop themselves and make amends or clean up after themselves, whatever the situation calls for. I *could* use techniques such as the one above, but I have a moral issue with that because I believe my children’s body belongs to themselves, therefore its a violation of their body that I am committing only because I am bigger and stronger than them. I don’t ever want my authority to stem from fear or the use of physical punishment.
    in agreement on the shaming thing too. that is no small thing to “get over” as an adult.

  9. Can Dance,
    I very very VERY very very much once thought, “no-spanking-equals-wild-children,” because the only two things I associated with “discipline” were spanking and time-outs, both of which I viewed as requiring punitive handling because without the punitive aspect, behaviour would never change.
    .
    Or…so I thought. It’s been wonderful to realize I was terribly terribly wrong. I’m glad you share a picture of a home where children have boundaries that are enforced by a parent, yet without spanking.
    .
    Jemila,
    I’ve enjoyed looking at the Christus Victor atonement theology for some similar reasons, as well as the Eastern church’s view of the atonement (which is more a focus on God saving us from death, from the prison of sin, as it were, and given new life by the Resurrection—- as opposed to the Augustinian/Western view that each individual sin must recieve a penalty and that Christ died to pay the legal penalty for our sins or God’s wrath would not be sated and thus we could not be forgiven, nor be recipients of His grace).
    .
    I wonder how accurate our “heavy-wrath” focus is. I’m not denying that God gets angry—-I’m more questioning the “legal-satisfaction” emphasis of the atonement that we’ve formulated in the West. If God’s wrath must first be sated before He can forgive, then God’s forgiveness (and His mercy and grace) are subject to His wrath. Something’s wrong with that picture, because the Bible says God is love, not God is wrath. So wherever the wrath/anger is, it has to fit into the picture of love, not the other way around. Ninevah is a good example…God was angry as their sin was great (and the cries of the suffering reached his ears). But God gave them mercy when they repented, gave them another chance… Unlike God, Jonah had a more “legal-satisfaction” view of things, and so pouted and fumed under a leafy plant…
    .
    I like how you bring atonement theories up, because our theology does inform our parenting sometimes. I mean, if all sin must be punished, and said punishment brings about reformation, then, well, the Pearls are right.
    .
    But if God knew our frame, that we were weak and helpless, and in mercy did FOR US what we could not do (by dying for us to save us from the power of sin and death), then…the Pearls are horribly wrong.

  10. I see it as a both/and ;-) . It just depends on where you put the focus at the time, and some can put the focus on one to the exclusion of the other.

  11. [...] Letter from Reader: Question on Disciplining Kids, Comments [...]

  12. Posted by GiGi on October 13, 2008 at 1:36 am

    Here’s an excellent discussion of Christus Victor atonement. It really opened my mind… never thought of it in that way before, but it makes so much sense.

    http://www.beyondtheboxpodcast.com/2008/09/gods-punishment-or-satans-defeat-part-1/

Respond to this post